Thats why they should have delayed it.

Is this, or is this not your pc stats?
It doesn't say "1337" anywhere dumbass.

But when you post your pc build in a public domain, you're obviously trying to get a point across. And to me, you look like a douche.

And I never mentioned my specs. In my time here on this forum. Ever. You're somewhat bizarre.



And you, along with many others butthurt that consoles "casualized" supcom2.



Yes, by far in my opinion. RTS are essentially built for the PC, its a match made in heaven. But that doesn't mean that a good RTS can't be made for the console. If a developer tries, and takes it seriously it can be done.

patches and updates? Well, thats SE and Microsofts own fault.

You aren't even worth a proper response Waluigi Time, I suggest you ask your mummy for a PC for your 13th birthday.

C'mon guiz no need for

dlc still not back on marketplace :l

Come on guys, don't drop the ball on this.


I will give you 800 points for the update alone the maps are just a bonus!

i just want the dlc on xbox i mean all the dlc not just maps it would also be nice to get rid of the glitches and bugs

Oh, thats nice. I told you the same thing a few posts ago. And yet you continue to dodge the points that I address to you.

Too bad I actually work for what I get, and my 13th birthday was many years ago; excellent insight there for sure.

Just drop this ****, its getting nowhere fast.



I still have no answer to any of my questions.
and I probably won't pay for the patches unless they get included with the DLC.

And if nothing ever comes through, I guess thats just that.

yeh i want dlc patches are a bonus 4 me

Wait, are you being serious?

No joke.

Universe at war- Controls were terrible, but the game was pretty slow to compensate at least.

Halo Wars- so simple that I could play it with my buttcheeks and still win. Utterly devoid of strategy. But still pretty fun.

Supreme Commander- Performance and controls were great, but the game suffered from glitches and lack of support.

Red Alert 3- Surprisingly good, it had some negative quirks here and there but it was pretty solid on the 360.

Kanes Wrath- Overall an enjoyable game, but it suffered from some lag and lack of direction in some places.

Supcom2 is pretty much as good as it gets. It has some downs, being smaller maps and less variety when it comes to standard units. But its pretty much the best RTS on a console. If patches could be applied along with what the pc currently has, well that would make the game ******* amazing.

IT IS?

I didnt know.

Wait, what did I miss here? I heard its terrible.

You marched in this old thread just to post that pointless post?

Yes, unless something better came along in the last 1.5 years, SupCom2 was considered the best RTS available on a console.

well even though this is all confusing and this conversation keeps going off point i still agree that those who worked on the the game are lazy ****'s.So the pc is the main platform for rts,there market in consoles are going down and down due to the lack of work and support on games like supcom2.I've been searching for a way of getting in contact with them but all have been nothing but tech support

It's not laziness, it's money (it is not cheap to produce a patch) and the powers that be (Square Enix, not GPG) determined that the cost of producing a patch would not cover the potential increase in revenue from new customers buying the game because of a patch.

Game programmers may have a passion for and a love for developing good games, but their time is limited and they must be paid for the time they spend making said games, and the suits at the top care about the bottom line of increased revenue.