Login  Register
 



Post new topicThis topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Author Message
 PostPosted: 01 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
Zataku wrote:
OrangeKnight wrote:
Xagar wrote:
Someone hates infinite resources?

....every CT game has and will continue to have infinite resources.

Who are you even talking to? the OP didn't even really mention the Econ in his post.

Mike


Actually, Orange, I did mention the econ. That's what I meant by "Flow Economy". I just heard these two idiots on youtube running the SupCom2 drinking game call it that, and I assumed that's what the proper name for FA econ was.


Another term floating around is "Deficit Banking."

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 06 Feb, 2010
Posts: 578
Location: Imperial Russia
Offline
madface wrote:
TheWord wrote:
Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!


No no no. You have it all wrong. It's: madface, then the rest.
that was order of appearance, not stupidity contest

_________________
[DW] Vladimir


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
B08AH wrote:
madface wrote:
TheWord wrote:
Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!


No no no. You have it all wrong. It's: madface, then the rest.
that was order of appearance, not stupidity contest


You're right, I forgot we're on the SupCom 2 forums.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 07 Jul, 2010
Posts: 2638
Offline
madface wrote:
B08AH wrote:
madface wrote:
TheWord wrote:
Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!


No no no. You have it all wrong. It's: madface, then the rest.
that was order of appearance, not stupidity contest


You're right, I forgot we're on the SupCom 2 forums.


I just have to step in here and say that in case they DID a stupidity contest, you'd probably fight cygnus in the finals.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
Nephylim wrote:
madface wrote:
B08AH wrote:
madface wrote:
TheWord wrote:
Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!


No no no. You have it all wrong. It's: madface, then the rest.
that was order of appearance, not stupidity contest


You're right, I forgot we're on the SupCom 2 forums.


I just have to step in here and say that in case they DID a stupidity contest, you'd probably fight cygnus in the finals.


Nah, I don't think I'll be playing SupCom 2 any time soon.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec, 2008
Posts: 3188
Offline
madface, you missed the point of what he was saying.

_________________
My system: Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.5 / 8 GB DDR3 RAM / EVGA GTX 670 FTW

"TA has been the role model of (sic) all Chris Taylor RTSes to come: always big, always complex, always innovative, always niche, and always in need of one more patch."


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
X-Cubed wrote:
madface, you missed the point of what he was saying.


You missed the point of what I was implying.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec, 2008
Posts: 3188
Offline
I get the point, but I don't get why you are calling SupCom2 a stupidity contest. Perhaps I have no sense of humor when online, but that joke isn't funny.

_________________
My system: Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.5 / 8 GB DDR3 RAM / EVGA GTX 670 FTW

"TA has been the role model of (sic) all Chris Taylor RTSes to come: always big, always complex, always innovative, always niche, and always in need of one more patch."


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 06 Feb, 2010
Posts: 578
Location: Imperial Russia
Offline
madface wrote:
B08AH wrote:
madface wrote:
TheWord wrote:
Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!


No no no. You have it all wrong. It's: madface, then the rest.
that was order of appearance, not stupidity contest


You're right, I forgot we're on the SupCom 2 forums.
right, you're on SupCom2 forum, so, by order of appearance, it is Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!

if it was a stupidity contest then what you said would be precise : "madface, then the rest."

Quote:
You missed the point of what I was implying.
noone missed what you wanted to imply, problem that is you are not intelligent enough to even get your implication out right.

_________________
[DW] Vladimir


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
B08AH wrote:
madface wrote:
B08AH wrote:
madface wrote:
TheWord wrote:
Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!


No no no. You have it all wrong. It's: madface, then the rest.
that was order of appearance, not stupidity contest


You're right, I forgot we're on the SupCom 2 forums.
right, you're on SupCom2 forum, so, by order of appearance, it is Cygnus + Madface, now + Zataku!

if it was a stupidity contest then what you said would be precise : "madface, then the rest."

Quote:
You missed the point of what I was implying.
noone missed what you wanted to imply, problem that is you are not intelligent enough to even get your implication out right.


Being called stupid by a SupCom 2 fan certainly does say something. I bet you're waiting for DLC 2, you know, the package that will add MORE units, just like DLC 1, to bring it all that much more closer to FA.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec, 2008
Posts: 3188
Offline
Once again, I'm afraid you have missed the point. The problem with FA was not that it had a lot of units, it was that too many of those units were repetitions of other units, just bigger and better. Too much redundancy. The only "bigger and better" unit that the DLC added was the Monkeylord, and only because players were clamoring for it. Some units might have niche roles, but they all had different purposes, not like FA with 3 units with the same role, each outclassing the previous iterations.

_________________
My system: Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.5 / 8 GB DDR3 RAM / EVGA GTX 670 FTW

"TA has been the role model of (sic) all Chris Taylor RTSes to come: always big, always complex, always innovative, always niche, and always in need of one more patch."


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 14 Dec, 2010
Posts: 243
Offline
Lenghty threads such as these may be confusing to participants who want to join in the discussion. I shall now proceed to sum up the arguments:

Images removed

As you can see, the argument is primarily about the length of a dick that is most enjoyable to suck. The 5 page discussion is indeed very lengthy with many up and downsides being mentioned.

To come to a conclusion, I suggest we ask the expert on sucking dicks. I believe he should be somewhere on the forums. Neph? Are you there? We need you here buddy.


Last edited by Cygmus on 02 Feb, 2011, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 07 Jul, 2010
Posts: 2638
Offline
Ill have to agree that I like the supcom2 system better. Whats the use of a T2 tank, when theres a t1 tank as well? It replaces it. Its like giving a rockhead an extra barrel - You still have a tank, its just a bit better. I like upgrading units better than making them useless. You still end up with the same unit mix - mostly tanks. In supcom2, every unit has an actual use. Granted, not all of them are very well balanced, but theyre all useful in their own right. (except the Pshield).


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 14 Dec, 2010
Posts: 243
Offline
The expert has spoken! Normal-sized dicks are the way to go!
I guess now we can end the discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 07 Jul, 2010
Posts: 2638
Offline
Cygmus wrote:
The expert has spoken! Normal-sized dicks are the way to go!
I guess now we can end the discussion.


Let me troll madface some more. You should do the same, dammit!


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 14 Dec, 2010
Posts: 243
Offline
I suggest we just cleanse this thread with fire. It has served it's purpose.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
X-Cubed wrote:
Once again, I'm afraid you have missed the point. The problem with FA was not that it had a lot of units, it was that too many of those units were repetitions of other units, just bigger and better. Too much redundancy. The only "bigger and better" unit that the DLC added was the Monkeylord, and only because players were clamoring for it. Some units might have niche roles, but they all had different purposes, not like FA with 3 units with the same role, each outclassing the previous iterations.


Then mod the units. Remember OTA? The higher tech level units did not make the lower tech ones obsolete - they just took on a slightly different role. Each unit more-or-less retained its uniqueness in the game. It is possible to mod FA so as to eliminate the redundancy. Just go into the blueprint files and edit what units can be built by other units and structures and change the stats. It's very easy to create upgradeable units in FA instead of obsoleting lower-tiered units. You still preserve the tier system of FA and TA, but reimplement it so as not to have redundancies.

Personally, I think FA messed up the tier system of TA. But that doesn't mean "just go and play TA". FA is not a perfect game, and I have criticisms of it in it's vanilla state, but at least I can mod it to play the way I want it to play and, therefore, I don't b1tch about it. GPG tried something new in FA as compared to TA, which is completely fine, but they allowed (read: supported) the rest of us to tailor the game to the way we individually like it.

SE came in, began migrating code into the engine, took away mod support, and will now just release DLC like a candy dispenser.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 14 Dec, 2010
Posts: 243
Offline
Quote:
release DLC like a candy dispenser.


1 actually enjoyable DLC comes out with funny, non-essential units (except shotjas, they're just gay): HOLY CRAP GPG HAS SOLD OUT AND IS CRAPPING OUT DLC EVEYRWHERE


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
Cygmus wrote:
Lenghty threads such as these may be confusing to participants who want to join in the discussion. I shall now proceed to sum up the arguments:

As you can see, the argument is primarily about the length of a dick that is most enjoyable to suck. The 5 page discussion is indeed very lengthy with many up and downsides being mentioned.

To come to a conclusion, I suggest we ask the expert on sucking dicks. I believe he should be somewhere on the forums. Neph? Are you there? We need you here buddy.


Hey Cygmus, maybe the next time you get banned you can change your name to Cygvus (where the "v" is the greek "n"). Wait, isn't "v" often used on the forums to spell cvnt?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 14 Dec, 2010
Posts: 243
Offline
Hey madface, perhaps you should change your name to "Imad" to resemble your current emotional state.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 07 Jul, 2010
Posts: 2638
Offline
Cygmus wrote:
Hey madface, perhaps you should change your name to "Imad" to resemble your current emotional state.


LOL +1
(artoftrolling.memebase.com?)

Well Imad's sense of humor sure is bad..


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 
User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan, 2010
Posts: 723
Location: My Man Cave
Offline
madface wrote:
Hey Cygmus, maybe the next time you get banned you can change your name to Cygvus (where the "v" is the greek "n"). Wait, isn't "v" often used on the forums to spell cvnt?


Dont even bother, you can't out troll the king of trolls...

_________________
Respectfully,

The Baron (Now Mortiferus Rosa everywhere else)


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
Nephylim wrote:
Cygmus wrote:
Hey madface, perhaps you should change your name to "Imad" to resemble your current emotional state.


LOL +1
(artoftrolling.memebase.com?)

Well Imad's sense of humor sure is bad..


Kind of like your attempt to play FA?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 01 Jan, 2011
Posts: 1025
Offline
-The-Baron- wrote:
madface wrote:
Hey Cygmus, maybe the next time you get banned you can change your name to Cygvus (where the "v" is the greek "n"). Wait, isn't "v" often used on the forums to spell cvnt?


Dont even bother, you can't out troll the king of trolls...


The king of trolls and cvnt of cvnts.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 02 Feb, 2011 
 

Joined: 14 Dec, 2010
Posts: 243
Offline
I still don't get why you're so mad.


Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next



Quick Tools

Search for:
Jump to:  

© 2002-2010 Gas Powered Games Corp. All Rights Reserved. Gas Powered Games is the exclusive trademark of Gas Powered Games Corp.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
 
Home| Games | Company | News & Press | Support
  Terms of Use   |    Copyright Information   |    Privacy Policy