Login  Register
 



Post new topicReply to topic Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Author Message
 PostPosted: 03 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Aug, 2007
Posts: 3598
Location: Aachen, Germany
Offline
I'd like to report two bugs:

my sig isn't working and


viewtopic.php?p=779779#p779779

Image

Opera Version 10.51, Build 3315, Platform Win32, System Windows XP

I'd also like to report Krimson for defending Faux News. :wink:

_________________
Find out more about Planetary Annihilation: http://www.uberent.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 05 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Sep, 2007
Posts: 6497
Location: In an RTD!!!
Offline
gpgITninja wrote:
Changes
1. Signature size: New sig size is: [color=#FF0000]680x(something not dumb) - Images wider than 680px in length will be auto resized by the forum. The quality of this won't be as good as if you resized it yourself.

EDIT: sig resizing doesn't appear to work in all cases... looking into this.

2. Image size: Image sizes allowed in posts are limited to 680x750, anything larger than this will be resized by the forum to fit these parameters (it takes into account landscape vs portrait and tries to keep scale) the image will then also become a link that will open to that image location directly in a new tab.[/color]


This goes horribly wrong. I made images that were scaled down because they were something like 800*1067. I resized them to 563*750. They get scaled down to 510*680.

http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?t=29933&start=0

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 05 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb, 2010
Posts: 646
Offline
The first image - the cover - in that link?

Image properties: 563px × 750px (scaled to 510px × 680px)

The width needs to be 680 or under, so it got reduced. Almost certainly this means gpgITninja meant 750 high x 680 wide.

If I'm doing the math right and you're keeping the aspect ratio, you'll end up with 750 high x 563 wide.

_________________
-æsir


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 05 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Sep, 2007
Posts: 6497
Location: In an RTD!!!
Offline
Aesir Rising wrote:
The first image - the cover - in that link?

Image properties: 563px × 750px (scaled to 510px × 680px)

The width needs to be 680 or under, so it got reduced. Almost certainly this means gpgITninja meant 750 high x 680 wide.

If I'm doing the math right and you're keeping the aspect ratio, you'll end up with 750 high x 563 wide.


If you take a careful look, you can see that the height is more than the width. So naturally, the height is 750 (maximum allowed) and the width is 563 (less than the maximum allowed).

I also double checked it in photoshop (when I resized it) because I thought the same thing as you, I did the resizing over (from the original large cover), typing in the new height -> 750. The width automatically changes to 563 because photoshop likes the words "aspect ratio".

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 05 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb, 2010
Posts: 646
Offline
I read your post a few times... knowing the risk of getting it wrong. I looked at your post, took the scaled down version as well as clicked through to get the juicy 1600x1200 version. And I guess I still got it wrong.

What res was it supposed to be?

_________________
-æsir


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 06 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Sep, 2007
Posts: 6497
Location: In an RTD!!!
Offline
With screen resolutions, we always take the width before height, so it's 1920*1200, 1920*1080 etc.

Then, the full cover is 1200*1600, the small cover will become 563*750.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 07 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 01 Mar, 2007
Posts: 4228
Location: In the cover of the sun, ready to strike.
Offline
I'm not sure if you were referring to this when you mentioned the bottom nav bar being pretty messed up (image wise), but when you load the site and rapidly scroll down (say Off-Topic is your first stop), you'll notice the purple bars at the bottom are yellow, right before they switch to the correct color of purple.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 

Joined: 05 Oct, 2007
Posts: 16449
Location: camping near the biggest power-up
Offline
No Messages seems to be broken for me; I would have had a PM in my inbox from Spooky for weeks if I hadn't seen the notification in my email.

when I went into the inbox, it changed to whatever yellow text it says (couldn't read it properly because it started wrapping onto a new line).

_________________
Nephylim wrote:
But, an FA army in an FA environment just looks... right.
help wrote:
Does anyone know how to use air transports? I cant get them to pick up troops.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb, 2010
Posts: 646
Offline
Profile | Show your posts is what I've been using in place of an on-page link to own posts or subscribed topics.

That egosearch doesn't float the unread results to the top of the list. New responses to topics posted within may appear on 2nd or (I presume) subsequent pages of the search result.


In other news, I saw a bump topic function. I used it once. It was better than posting fluff to float a topic. Neat idea.

_________________
-æsir


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 9775
Location: Austria
Offline
Aesir Rising wrote:
Profile | Show your posts is what I've been using in place of an on-page link to own posts or subscribed topics.

That egosearch doesn't float the unread results to the top of the list. New responses to topics posted within may appear on 2nd or (I presume) subsequent pages of the search result.

The "newposts" and "egosearch" search is and always was sorted by "Last post". Unread topics where never kept at the top of the list, regardless of its last post date.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb, 2010
Posts: 646
Offline
Must be mixing this up with a bunch of other forums then. So... re-wording:
Can we please have subscriptions and own post topics that have new replies floated to the top of the search results?

_________________
-æsir


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 01 Mar, 2007
Posts: 4228
Location: In the cover of the sun, ready to strike.
Offline
Quick question, what exactly is the point of the "Go to page" link at the top? It has a descriptive text, yet it only sends you back to the page you're already on. So in essence, it refreshes the page, but adds to your browser history.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Sep, 2007
Posts: 6497
Location: In an RTD!!!
Offline
Code:
<a href="#" onclick="jumpto(); return false;" title="Click to jump to page…">Go to page</a>


I think that it's turned into an url but the onclick="jumpto(); return false;" part messes it up. (I don't have so much experience with any sort of programming though).

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: 11 Jun, 2007
Posts: 225
Offline
Solar wrote:
I'm not sure if you were referring to this when you mentioned the bottom nav bar being pretty messed up (image wise), but when you load the site and rapidly scroll down (say Off-Topic is your first stop), you'll notice the purple bars at the bottom are yellow, right before they switch to the correct color of purple.

The yellow is a background color I used to find css elements on the page during construction, it will be fixed tomorrow when I upload the new version.

BulletMagnet wrote:
No Messages seems to be broken for me; I would have had a PM in my inbox from Spooky for weeks if I hadn't seen the notification in my email.

Also should be fixed in the new version

Aesir Rising wrote:
Must be mixing this up with a bunch of other forums then. So... re-wording:
Can we please have subscriptions and own post topics that have new replies floated to the top of the search results?

I'm not sure what all would need to be done to do such a thing, but I will look into it.

Solar wrote:
Quick question, what exactly is the point of the "Go to page" link at the top? It has a descriptive text, yet it only sends you back to the page you're already on. So in essence, it refreshes the page, but adds to your browser history.

That might have just been an error on my part, I don't think the "go to page" portion is actually supposed to be a link.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jul, 2007
Posts: 4513
Location: Ohio, USA
Offline
BulletMagnet wrote:
No Messages seems to be broken for me; I would have had a PM in my inbox from Spooky for weeks if I hadn't seen the notification in my email.

when I went into the inbox, it changed to whatever yellow text it says (couldn't read it properly because it started wrapping onto a new line).


I thought I was just being ignored :oops:
Thanks for catching this BM :)

_________________
Image
sig by CUI-Krusty The Clown

_PINK wrote:
I'll fiddle your sticks!


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Aug, 2007
Posts: 3598
Location: Aachen, Germany
Offline
Yeah, good catch BM! And sorry about the late response!

_________________
Find out more about Planetary Annihilation: http://www.uberent.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 01 Mar, 2007
Posts: 4228
Location: In the cover of the sun, ready to strike.
Offline
gpgITninja wrote:
Thygrrr wrote:
Also, something in the Javascript that makes the layout causes the whole center DIV to be shifted right a good way (half the screen, it seems) before snapping back once loading continues, which makes browsing painful.


Looking into this, I have seen it as well.


Will this be fixed in the update? This happens the first time I want to post a response each time I load the forums. It's sort of annoying. (I'm asking since you're updating the site layout, and you said you were looking into it, but I'm not sure if you've found a solution to the problem yet.)


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 08 Aug, 2007
Posts: 3598
Location: Aachen, Germany
Offline
Yeah, please take a look at the PM system again ITninja. One of the PMs still showed up as unread after I had already responded to it and at the bottom is a button missing (the reply button under the quoted message). Thx.

_________________
Find out more about Planetary Annihilation: http://www.uberent.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb, 2010
Posts: 646
Offline
re: inbox, I don't think that update went in yet.

_________________
-æsir


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 08 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun, 2009
Posts: 314
Offline
Just switch to VB

_________________
I type in magenta.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 09 Apr, 2010 
 

Joined: 27 May, 2009
Posts: 409
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Offline
.
Funny thread. i hadn't read this before. A lot of Michelangelo's in here. Melissa made me laugh.

The thing about web design, is it's all about colour schemes. Using colours that complement each other.

That's the trick.

Then Melissa's eyes won't feel raped. :mrgreen:


Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 09 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 09 Mar, 2007
Posts: 218
Location: Australia
Offline
Is there any possibility of you guys turning on the RSS Feed functionality of the forum? It's a good way to surf the forum at work. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 09 Apr, 2010 
 
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: 11 Jun, 2007
Posts: 225
Offline
Solar wrote:
Will this be fixed in the update? This happens the first time I want to post a response each time I load the forums. It's sort of annoying. (I'm asking since you're updating the site layout, and you said you were looking into it, but I'm not sure if you've found a solution to the problem yet.)

I haven't even had a chance to dig into what is causing this.

Xenesis wrote:
Is there any possibility of you guys turning on the RSS Feed functionality of the forum? It's a good way to surf the forum at work. :wink:

Possibly...


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 09 Apr, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar, 2010
Posts: 1174
Location: Chicago, IL
Offline
For some reason, after this update today, the forums are not being marked read after I clicked the button.

EDIT: And thank you for bringing back the time the post was made. I missed that. :)

_________________
Image
Steam = RPhilMan1


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 09 Apr, 2010 
 
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: 11 Jun, 2007
Posts: 225
Offline
RPhilMan1 wrote:
For some reason, after this update today, the forums are not being marked read after I clicked the button.

EDIT: And thank you for bringing back the time the post was made. I missed that. :)


This may have something to do with stale cookies, you can try using the link at the bottom to delete all board cookies, then clicking the link at the top to mark all forums read.


Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next



Quick Tools

Search for:
Jump to:  

© 2002-2010 Gas Powered Games Corp. All Rights Reserved. Gas Powered Games is the exclusive trademark of Gas Powered Games Corp.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
 
Home| Games | Company | News & Press | Support
  Terms of Use   |    Copyright Information   |    Privacy Policy