Your not getting the point, I didn't mean anything like that.

I don't own a supcom-capable pc. I shouldn't be bashing it.
I own supcom 360, I'm allowed to bash it because I've had enough experience to know What part of it to bash.

I'm saying that unless you prove that you have it, you shouldn't be bashing it. You don't know enough about it to bash it. It's like hating a game when you don't even own it. the game isn't all terrible, I never said anything about "pc-elitest pig" or remotely try to say the console version is superior.

Did it really take you 8 days to think that up?

You're the asstard who posted five days after a dead /thread post, so that 8 day assertion is complete ****.


Nice try though, maybe next time.



And I will just go out on a limb and say the 360 version is shat, just as much as the C&C3 game I played on the 360 before I played it on PC was shat. It was even more **** after I played it on the PC and new for sure. No different with supcom.

Wait, it is even more different with supcom! Because supcom has so much more action going on, strategic zoom, higher graphical demands, more processing needs, etc. Just by associating a console supcom with the ungodly **** that was the console C&C, I can say that the 360 supcom was ****, and sleep soundly at night. Sometimes you don't have to experience somehing to have a decent idea of how it would be.


Like, for instance, I haven't been shot, but I'm pretty damn sure it would hurt like a sumbitch, would you call me ignorant for making that assumption? Would you say "you don't know enough about being shot to say it sucks, so don't say it!"?


If so, good for you buddy. Have fun riding the special bus to school tomorrow then.

It's bad when I don't post for 5 days, but when you don't respond until more than a week later, I'm the asstard?

CnC on the console is complete ****.

Supcom runs with almost no lag, and Better graphics than the pc I have can run.

Guess what? I'm taking all honors classes with straight A's
When you try not to insult someon's intelligence, Try checking up on your own first.

I refuse to answer to anymore of your pointless agression, It's obvious that you have your head up your *** while you type.

Everyone who cares or thinks this is tangentially relevant, raise your hands.

+1 to you good sir.




¬


I think you should take a few of those "honors" courses again, because your math is utter bollocks. My /thread post was on the 12th, you posted on the 17th, people (including you) kept posting thru till the 20th (yesterday) which is when I got back to campus and actually saw the forums for the first time in six days, which is when I replied to your idiocy.

Not sure where I waited a week with no posts in the topic then replied. The asstard comment was because you replied to a pretty much dead thread, or did you not grasp that at all?

And you did just ignore my point, not that I expected an actual retort of worth or anything.

Oh, and just because you just had to go the e-peen route, I guess we can all be just as base and childish and do that too! So if arbitrary grades and schooling defines how smart you are and validates your post, then my college education in philosophy means I'm better than you at arguing, understanding other peoples points, and deconstructing them. Oh boy!

Is indeed relevant to someones knowledge, but not to someones ability of thinking or make a statement. Playing a game however, is not relevant to either.

The only thing that can be said about supcom 360 is that it's a bad game and people should actually play it (and all other RTS games) on a pc. It does not tell how intelligent a person is.

We established that. Why did you bump this to tell us?

If you admit that what he said is relevant in some way, why did you deny it?

Thats why its relevant, I'm surprised that no one was observant enough to realize it.

Why did you quote me....butthurt much?

To drill it through your thick skulls that can't seem to comprehend anything.

Your posts make me laugh, It's like you say your point and then try and squeeze in any kind of insult your brain can muster up for me; In an obsessive attempt to make me look bad.

This is so juicy. <3

Can you two just take it to PMs please? Stop filling up our lovely forum with your dumb brain-fart insults. I've read more entertaining prose in Fox News screen tickers.

Okay, I apologize, I'll stop.

But I'm not taking it to PM, I'm just ending it!

I must point out one of Scotch's statements that is blatantly false.



At least at the time of SupCom360, a gaming rig that could handle SupCom is significantly more expensive than the most expensive of the Xbox 360's available at that the time, the elite. The elite was $400, and my PC, which can only moderately run SupCom well was 2K. Of course, I did not build it myself, as A) I was around 13, and I did not have the know-how to build my own, and B) My dad didn't (and still doesn't) have the know-how to build a PC. Yes, it was overpriced, as we bought it from dell, but even built by the user, a gaming PC would still be several hundred dollars more expensive.

Most of the people that have SupCom360, cannot afford a gaming PC that can run it. Why punish them for getting as close to the full glory of SupCom as they can afford? SupCom360 is better than no SupCom at all?

And for your information, I have SupCom and FA on the PC. However, if my PC was not powerful enough to run it, I would have gotten it on 360, as it would have been the best I could get.

[EDIT] Oops. Do to the desolation and emptiness of this forum, I did not notice this was a month old. I apologize for this.

lol, no problem

I will tell you though, to get the 360 elite, and the game (which was forty bucks more than standard supcom) would have costed about the same as a computer of supcom playability.