Login  Register
 



Post new topicReply to topic Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
Author Message
 PostPosted: 24 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
Below are all the main patches that Supreme commander Using and Forged Alliance from Retail to latest and Incremental patches if needed. Note that officially hosted patches can still be found via THIS thread.

Supreme Commander

From retail to current Vertion ~ 1.1.3280

From retail to ~ 1.1.3217
From 1.1.3217 to ~ 1.1.3220
From 1.1.3220 to ~ 1.1.3223
From 1.1.3223 to ~ 1.1.3251
From 1.1.3251 to ~ 1.1.3254
From 1.1.3254 to ~ 1.1.3255
From 1.1.3255 to ~ 1.1.3260
From 1.1.3260 to ~ 1.1.3269
From 1.1.3269 to ~ 1.1.3280

Forged Alliance

The Current Beta ~ FA Beta
For More information about the beta please go ~ Here
To install the beta please read the instruction of the following link very carefully ~ click here

From retail to current Vertion ~ 1.5.3599

From retail to ~ 1.5.3598 No CD need for this patch
From retail to ~ 1.5.3598 CD need for this patch
From 1.5.3598 to ~ 1.5.3599

Gas Powered Games Aplication

Latest GPGnet Version ~ 1.5.225

AMD Dual-Core Optimizer

1.1.4.0169

Intel  Core Maximizer

1.03

More information can be found here about the patches ~ http://gpgnet.obliteratingwave.co.uk/ Please not the links above have been changed to a new download mirror so downloads are way faster

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Last edited by reddev32 on 21 Jan, 2012, edited 16 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 24 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Mar, 2007
Posts: 1724
Offline
Hum a nicer cleaner version of this topic with the core maximizers in it.

Does the MadBoris Core max only work for Intel CPUs? If so I recommended it to some AMD user by mistake.

_________________
the86th wrote:
Lambda is weird, weird things happen.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 24 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
Ya it is a nice clean up. i looked @ it and went WOW what a holy mess of what ever it was :D

You should recommend amd users that have dual core to use the amd dual core program it really helps, but if they have quad core i am currently not sure about core maximises there use.

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 24 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout
User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb, 2007
Posts: 8749
Location: Belgium
Offline
Madboris' core maximizer works fine on AMD and Intel cores.

_________________
Image
Global Moderator and creator of LabWars


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
Legion Darrath wrote:
Madboris' core maximizer works fine on AMD and Intel cores.


As i said before people should really use the AMD Dual core to get the best out of it, Madbris may work well for AMD quads.

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout
User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb, 2007
Posts: 8749
Location: Belgium
Offline
reddev32 wrote:
Legion Darrath wrote:
Madboris' core maximizer works fine on AMD and Intel cores.


As i said before people should really use the AMD Dual core to get the best out of it, Madbris may work well for AMD quads.


First of all, they shouldn't do anything.
Second of all, SupCom on a dual core or quad core doesn't make that much of a difference.
Third of all, Madboris' maximizer works totally fine for all types and brands of cores so there's no need to distinguish between them.

_________________
Image
Global Moderator and creator of LabWars


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
Legion Darrath wrote:
reddev32 wrote:
Legion Darrath wrote:
Madboris' core maximizer works fine on AMD and Intel cores.


As i said before people should really use the AMD Dual core to get the best out of it, Madbris may work well for AMD quads.


First of all, they shouldn't do anything.
Second of all, SupCom on a dual core or quad core doesn't make that much of a difference.
Third of all, Madboris' maximizer works totally fine for all types and brands of cores so there's no need to distinguish between them.


Again LD AMD make the program for a reason FOR IT TO IMPROVE communication between the cores for NORMAL and GAMING use.

If u never had an AMD system you would not have a clue and NICE work on getting me banned again.

Dual Core Optimizer is a fix for broken clock sync on the AMD cpu's.

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout
User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb, 2007
Posts: 8749
Location: Belgium
Offline
reddev32 wrote:
Legion Darrath wrote:
reddev32 wrote:
Legion Darrath wrote:
Madboris' core maximizer works fine on AMD and Intel cores.


As i said before people should really use the AMD Dual core to get the best out of it, Madbris may work well for AMD quads.


First of all, they shouldn't do anything.
Second of all, SupCom on a dual core or quad core doesn't make that much of a difference.
Third of all, Madboris' maximizer works totally fine for all types and brands of cores so there's no need to distinguish between them.


Again LD AMD make the program for a reason FOR IT TO IMPROVE communication between the cores for NORMAL and GAMING use.

If u never had an AMD system you would not have a clue and NICE work on getting me banned again.

Dual Core Optimizer is a fix for broken clock sync on the AMD cpu's.


I have an AMD system and you had it coming.

_________________
Image
Global Moderator and creator of LabWars


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
i had it coming what for not doing much and playing games or that he realy just hates me u choose

http://reddev32.supcom2.co.uk/wtf%20valk1.bmp that is realy a 6 month ban I DON'T THINK SO

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout
User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb, 2007
Posts: 8749
Location: Belgium
Offline
That isn't, all the other stunts you pulled are.

_________________
Image
Global Moderator and creator of LabWars


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
Legion Darrath wrote:
That isn't, all the other stunts you pulled are.

says that one that treated to go round someone's house and my other stunts which u say he started of not me and i am not going to do this on the forums SO I AM ENDING IT NOW

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 25 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout
User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb, 2007
Posts: 8749
Location: Belgium
Offline
reddev32 wrote:
Legion Darrath wrote:
That isn't, all the other stunts you pulled are.

says that one that treated to go round someone's house and my other stunts which u say he started of not me and i am not going to do this on the forums SO I AM ENDING IT NOW


ALRIGHT WITH ME

_________________
Image
Global Moderator and creator of LabWars


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 20 Apr, 2007
Posts: 1524
Location: VT, USA
Offline
Did you guys honestly have to start a flame war in what was supposed to have been a helpful thread?

_________________
Nuke/Shield Collide Mod topic thread
My Mods


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout
User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb, 2007
Posts: 8749
Location: Belgium
Offline
FuryoftheStars wrote:
Did you guys honestly have to start a flame war in what was supposed to have been a helpful thread?


Only the first post has to be helpful >.>

_________________
Image
Global Moderator and creator of LabWars


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec, 2008
Posts: 2178
Location: N.Ireland
Offline
good thread

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 20 Apr, 2007
Posts: 1524
Location: VT, USA
Offline
Legion Darrath wrote:
FuryoftheStars wrote:
Did you guys honestly have to start a flame war in what was supposed to have been a helpful thread?


Only the first post has to be helpful >.>

:lol:

_________________
Nuke/Shield Collide Mod topic thread
My Mods


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
Legion Darrath wrote:
FuryoftheStars wrote:
Did you guys honestly have to start a flame war in what was supposed to have been a helpful thread?


Only the first post has to be helpful >.>


ld u really a sore person

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 9774
Location: Austria
Offline
The "AMD Dual-Core Optimizer" is only for Windows XP 32 SP2, because there is an issue with multi-cores. You don't need it if you have an other OS than Windows XP 32 and you don't need it if you have Windows XP SP1 or SP3. And you don't need it if you have Windows XP 32 SP2 with the KB896256 hotfix installed and activated through the registry.


The Core Maximizer is not specific to Intel CPUs.


FuryoftheStars wrote:
Did you guys honestly have to start a flame war in what was supposed to have been a helpful thread?
The first post lacks in quality.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 Jun, 2008
Posts: 1845
Location: England
Offline
Spooky wrote:
The "AMD Dual-Core Optimizer" is only for Windows XP 32 SP2, because there is an issue with multi-cores. You don't need it if you have an other OS than Windows XP 32 and you don't need it if you have Windows XP SP1 or SP3. And you don't need it if you have Windows XP 32 SP2 with the KB896256 hotfix installed and activated through the registry.


the amd core opti is used for all OS but it not needed for xp sp3, vista and win 7 cause MS have put it into the patches of the OS.

_________________
Reddev32 ~ Reddev GPGnet ~ Obliterating Wave ~ GPGnet ~ SC-Vanilla ~ FA ~ Supcom 2

GPGnet Vault


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 26 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 9774
Location: Austria
Offline
reddev32 wrote:
the amd core opti is used for all OS but it not needed for xp sp3, vista and win 7 cause MS have put it into the patches of the OS.
...

yes, and therefore you only need to install it, if you have Windows XP 32 SP2. It will do absolutely nothing in every other case.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 27 Oct, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout
User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb, 2007
Posts: 8749
Location: Belgium
Offline
Spooky wrote:
FuryoftheStars wrote:
Did you guys honestly have to start a flame war in what was supposed to have been a helpful thread?
The first post lacks in quality.


<3

_________________
Image
Global Moderator and creator of LabWars


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 06 Nov, 2009 
 

Joined: 18 Oct, 2009
Posts: 14
Offline
Sticky this. This one is far most up-to-date then the sticky at the top. Until I read this, I didn't even know about 3269, let alone 3280!


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 06 Dec, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov, 2009
Posts: 38
Offline
Voted no for the lulz

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 28 Feb, 2010 
 
User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 216
Offline
nice topic

+1


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 16 Jun, 2010 
 

Joined: 16 Jun, 2010
Posts: 6
Offline
This is awesome!

I wish google would have lead me here to begin with rather then all those other sites I have been going to for bits and pieces of information, often confusing me :(

GJ! TY!!


Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic Go to page 1, 2  Next



Quick Tools

Search for:
Jump to:  

© 2002-2010 Gas Powered Games Corp. All Rights Reserved. Gas Powered Games is the exclusive trademark of Gas Powered Games Corp.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
 
Home| Games | Company | News & Press | Support
  Terms of Use   |    Copyright Information   |    Privacy Policy