Login  Register
 



Post new topicReply to topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 27  Next
 
Author Message
 PostPosted: 09 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 01 Mar, 2007
Posts: 4228
Location: In the cover of the sun, ready to strike.
Offline
If that means they're going for straight hover, then the maps are going to have to be adjusted, because otherwise Aeon will utterly dominate on small maps with water... Hmm, we'll have to wait and see how this goes.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 09 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 803
Offline
Ryuken wrote:
Yup, it would fit in the general theme of UEF having tracked units, Cybran legged units and Aeon/Illuminate the hover units.

It'll be interesting to see what GPG is gonna do with the Illuminate naval tech tree then, replace it with pure hover based stuff I guess? And then there must be some kind of hoverbased experimental for Illuminate as well then (that 'Ear Canal' thing perhaps).


Unless it's the Cybran who don't get any navy units. In Supcom1, Cybrans didn't have the best navy in a number of ways, but they could do some major damage with experimentals like the megalith. It wouldn't surprise me if they removed the Cybran navy in favor of giving them more amphibious units.

It'll be interesting however; I hope they do more with they navy this time around, like underwater bases and such.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 10 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 01 Mar, 2007
Posts: 4228
Location: In the cover of the sun, ready to strike.
Offline
Experimentals that can fail? Interesting...


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 10 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec, 2008
Posts: 3345
Location: Germany
Offline
Solar wrote:
Experimentals that can fail? Interesting...
Indeed.
I´m interested in how this is exactly supposed to look ingame ...

_________________
Image
Rasti - sig made by myself with my poor PS skills


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 10 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 01 Aug, 2007
Posts: 5399
Location: Shitting in the wishing well!
Offline
Experimentals unlock on a timed scale now?

hmm...

Why not, instead of having to wait for that, have the ability to put research points in experimentals to shorten the amount of time needed to get them?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 10 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb, 2007
Posts: 978
Location: Belgium
Offline
That's just a time estimate I think, of how the average game (or campaign Operation) would turn out.

_________________
Supreme Commander 2 videos, articles, dev posts and more: http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=37297
Kings and Castles videos, articles, dev posts and more:
http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=48269


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 10 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb, 2007
Posts: 1392
Location: on the move
Offline
There are two "new" old videos on gamespot that you can add.

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/sup ... index.html

Demo footage but high quality with in game music and sound effects.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 10 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb, 2007
Posts: 978
Location: Belgium
Offline
Added, nice catch.

_________________
Supreme Commander 2 videos, articles, dev posts and more: http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=37297
Kings and Castles videos, articles, dev posts and more:
http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=48269


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 11 Jun, 2009 
 

Joined: 07 Aug, 2007
Posts: 172
Offline
I'm still questioning how subcom 2 will play on large maps like 40x40 with alot of units and 80x80 with barley any units.

Chris said that Subcom 2 was demoed on a 2 year old pc. We big deal. I was able to play Subcom 1 on a 3 year old Pc when Subcom 1 came out since it was playing on a 10x10 map which in the Subcom 2 demo, the map is probably a 10x10.

The real question is the physics. How well with this engine handle it because I'm on a 3.8 quad and 80x80 maps simply aren't playable at all once there is a small amount of units on board as well as all the water. 40x40 is a little better, but still slows when you get around 300 units per player even on maps with little water. 20x20 slows down when you get 500 units per player especially on Setons Clutch with all that water.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 11 Jun, 2009 
 

Joined: 07 Aug, 2007
Posts: 172
Offline
Mazrix wrote:
Experimentals unlock on a timed scale now?

hmm...

Why not, instead of having to wait for that, have the ability to put research points in experimentals to shorten the amount of time needed to get them?


Why not keep it the way it was or at least give the host the option for experimental unlock times. Don't limit players to only use experimentals at a certain point. I see it the same as 'No Rush' time. It is an option.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 13 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar, 2007
Posts: 18
Offline
They are dumbing it down. So im guessing based on what he said that they removed the per second resource rate and made it more like a normal RTS

That was a huuuuge mechanic of the SC and they dumbed it down. Im gonna wait for the reviews before i snag this one. probably going to be a simcity societies


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 13 Jun, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 9774
Location: Austria
Offline
OblivionLord wrote:
Why not keep it the way it was or at least give the host the option for experimental unlock times. Don't limit players to only use experimentals at a certain point. I see it the same as 'No Rush' time. It is an option.

You should read that statement and the thread again ;). Experimentals aren't unlocked at a certain time. It was just a statement regarding the average timeframes where you would unlock the experimentals in the tech tree.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 15 Jun, 2009 
 

Joined: 31 May, 2009
Posts: 82
Offline
Im starting to think these RTS maps are getting LESS realistic!

Take a look at a SupCom2 screenshot. Ok? See the ground allumination and cartoonish setting? The way the ground looks more like a giant mirror than a textured surface?

Now look at a World in Conflict screenshot, and tell me that doesnt look absulutly perfect. The trees look like pines, not just trees. The Tanks each have charactoristc features. You can see texture on the road, which makes it look 'unclean' like it's covered in dust and dirt and grime. Also look at all the debris. Trash cans, boxes, soda cans, they're all flying about. Look at the complexity of the map creater, the shockwaves from nukes. All these suttle things that make it more movielike.

Now look at Supcom 2. The cities are cleaner, the units less grimy, the explosions too fire-ry, aircraft that look like balloons, that kind of thing.

_________________
Beware the Commander of the six hundred and seventy-second Node!


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 15 Jun, 2009 
 

Joined: 05 Oct, 2007
Posts: 16425
Location: camping near the biggest power-up
Offline
do you realise how big a trash can is compared to an ACU?

_________________
Nephylim wrote:
But, an FA army in an FA environment just looks... right.
help wrote:
Does anyone know how to use air transports? I cant get them to pick up troops.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 16 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 803
Offline
Hey Ryuken, why not use the second post as a reference for all the material, and the first post for just the newest stuff?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 16 Jun, 2009 
 

Joined: 15 Jun, 2009
Posts: 77
Offline
commander672 wrote:
Im starting to think these RTS maps are getting LESS realistic!

Take a look at a SupCom2 screenshot. Ok? See the ground allumination and cartoonish setting? The way the ground looks more like a giant mirror than a textured surface?

Now look at a World in Conflict screenshot, and tell me that doesnt look absulutly perfect. The trees look like pines, not just trees. The Tanks each have charactoristc features. You can see texture on the road, which makes it look 'unclean' like it's covered in dust and dirt and grime. Also look at all the debris. Trash cans, boxes, soda cans, they're all flying about. Look at the complexity of the map creater, the shockwaves from nukes. All these suttle things that make it more movielike.

Now look at Supcom 2. The cities are cleaner, the units less grimy, the explosions too fire-ry, aircraft that look like balloons, that kind of thing.


its good to note square enix, a japanese company, is involved in this game and especially the story...

You can't have femine emotive guys with odd colored spiked hair without the unrealistically colorful and happy anime setting!


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 17 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb, 2007
Posts: 978
Location: Belgium
Offline
Cybran Freedom Fighter wrote:
Hey Ryuken, why not use the second post as a reference for all the material, and the first post for just the newest stuff?

You got a point, people will have to scroll too much to notice new stuff so I'll mention the recent updates on top separately.

I am sure I am gonna need that second post when more SupCom 2 media comes out. Believe me, you never have enough room in this kind of thread, I know what I am talking about. :wink:

_________________
Supreme Commander 2 videos, articles, dev posts and more: http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=37297
Kings and Castles videos, articles, dev posts and more:
http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=48269


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 28 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb, 2007
Posts: 72
Location: Auckland, NZ
Offline
OOo. Might be new, else i missed it. On the SupCom 2 website you can now click on the UEF pistol to get a message from the front!

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 28 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb, 2007
Posts: 978
Location: Belgium
Offline
Nice catch, I've added it to the first post.

_________________
Supreme Commander 2 videos, articles, dev posts and more: http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=37297
Kings and Castles videos, articles, dev posts and more:
http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=48269


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 28 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec, 2008
Posts: 3345
Location: Germany
Offline
Wasn´t that there from the start? :?
Or was that only another message on that screen? ...

_________________
Image
Rasti - sig made by myself with my poor PS skills


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 28 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb, 2007
Posts: 978
Location: Belgium
Offline
It could be yeah :) , but anyway, now we're sure nobody misses it.

_________________
Supreme Commander 2 videos, articles, dev posts and more: http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=37297
Kings and Castles videos, articles, dev posts and more:
http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=48269


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 29 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 05 May, 2008
Posts: 7770
Location: Backstabbing the bastard no-scoping the camper
Offline
commander672 wrote:
Im starting to think these RTS maps are getting LESS realistic!

Take a look at a SupCom2 screenshot. Ok? See the ground allumination and cartoonish setting? The way the ground looks more like a giant mirror than a textured surface?

Now look at a World in Conflict screenshot, and tell me that doesnt look absulutly perfect. The trees look like pines, not just trees. The Tanks each have charactoristc features. You can see texture on the road, which makes it look 'unclean' like it's covered in dust and dirt and grime. Also look at all the debris. Trash cans, boxes, soda cans, they're all flying about. Look at the complexity of the map creater, the shockwaves from nukes. All these suttle things that make it more movielike.

Now look at Supcom 2. The cities are cleaner, the units less grimy, the explosions too fire-ry, aircraft that look like balloons, that kind of thing.

Eh, SupCom is set 1000 years from WiC
I would think cities are way cleaner. Also, the scale of SupCom is way too big to go and display every little can.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 30 Jun, 2009 
 
Forum Scout
Forum Scout

Joined: 15 Feb, 2007
Posts: 9774
Location: Austria
Offline
So, still no scans yet?


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 30 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb, 2007
Posts: 978
Location: Belgium
Offline
I was thinking the same thing, PC Gamer UK subscribers already have the newest issue, last time someone scanned it almost straight away (I guess he's on holiday now).

_________________
Supreme Commander 2 videos, articles, dev posts and more: http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=37297
Kings and Castles videos, articles, dev posts and more:
http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=48269


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: 30 Jun, 2009 
 
User avatar

Joined: 22 May, 2008
Posts: 182
Location: Swe
Offline
Will there really be fewer polygons per unit?


Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 27  Next



Quick Tools

Search for:
Jump to:  

© 2002-2010 Gas Powered Games Corp. All Rights Reserved. Gas Powered Games is the exclusive trademark of Gas Powered Games Corp.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
 
Home| Games | Company | News & Press | Support
  Terms of Use   |    Copyright Information   |    Privacy Policy